Metallic staples line mimicking a retained surgical sponge

Authors

L Cardinale Radiology Unit
C Fava Radiology Unit
N Dervisci Radiology Unit
D Najada Radiology Unit
P Borasio Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Turin, Department of Clinical & Biological Sciences, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
F Ardissone Thoracic Surgery Unit, University of Turin, Department of Clinical & Biological Sciences, Orbassano, Turin, Italy

DOI:

Keywords:

Foreign bodies

Abstract

The inadvertent loss of surgical sponges remains a dreadful hazard of surgery. We report the case of a patient with a medical history of myotonic dystrophy type 1 who had received a right upper lobectomy for the treatment of a stage IIA (pT1N1M0) well differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In the early postoperative period, aspiration of gastric contents occurred and the patient underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. A follow-up multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan of the chest showed a complex mass in interlobar position with an internal radiopaque serpiginous thread of metallic density which was assumed to represent a retained surgical sponge. Upon surgical exploration, no retained foreign body was found and a zone of recent hemorrhagic infarction, bordered by the line of the mechanical staples used to complete the minor fissure, was removed from the middle lobe. When evaluating patients suspected of having a retained surgical sponge, thoracic surgeons and radiologists should be aware of this potential source of confusion.

Downloads

Published

2010-05-06

Issue

Vol. 93 No. 5 (2010)

Section

Original Article

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.

Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).